Rensselaer Electric Co. v. T. E. Ibberson & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rensselaer Electric Co. v. T. E. Ibberson & Co.

311 So. 2d 674, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15058

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1975

DocketNo. 74-257

StatusPublished

This text of 311 So. 2d 674 (Rensselaer Electric Co. v. T. E. Ibberson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rensselaer Electric Co. v. T. E. Ibberson & Co., 311 So. 2d 674, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15058 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the respective parties, we determine that the trial court’s award of $1000 attorney’s fees to appellee, T. E. Ibberson & Company, for prosecution of the indemnity action was unauthorized. See Tidewater Construction Corporation v. Southern Materials Company, 269 F.Supp. 1000 (D.C.1967) ; Continental Casualty Company v. Reddick, 196 So.2d 239 (Fla.App.1967). Accordingly, the final judgment on cross claim is modified by striking said award and reducing appellee’s recovery from appellant, Rensselaer Electric Company, to $9,560.08. In all other respects the final judgment on cross claim is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the respective parties, we determine that the trial court’s award of $1000 attorney’s fees to appellee, T. E. Ibberson & Company, for prosecution of the indemnity action was unauthorized. See Tidewater Construction Corporation v. Southern Materials Company, 269 F.Supp. 1000 (D.C.1967) ; Continental Casualty Company v. Reddick, 196 So.2d 239 (Fla.App.1967). Accordingly, the final judgment on cross claim is modified by striking said award and reducing appellee’s recovery from appellant, Rensselaer Electric Company, to $9,560.08. In all other respects the final judgment on cross claim is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 So. 2d 674, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rensselaer-electric-co-v-t-e-ibberson-co-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack