Renoux v. Geney
32 Misc. 702, 65 N.Y.S. 508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Renoux v. Geney. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Misc. 782 →
Opinion
This is an action for conversion, and on the cross-examination of Harris, a witness for the plaintiff, he was asked as to an assignment alleged to have been made to his wife respect[703]*703ing a part of the fund in controversy. On objection the question was excluded. This was manifest error. It was certainly proper to show the interest, if any, that the witness had in the matter in suit as affecting his credibility.
Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Renoux v. Geney, 32 Misc. 702, 65 N.Y.S. 508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
32 Misc. 702 (Renoux v. Geney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.