Reno v. Pfeil Cooperage, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reno v. Pfeil Cooperage, Inc.

258 A.D. 849, 15 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 849 (Reno v. Pfeil Cooperage, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reno v. Pfeil Cooperage, Inc., 258 A.D. 849, 15 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The evidence supports the verdict of the jury. We have examined the rulings complained of and find in them no error of substance. The judgment should be affirmed. (See Watson v. Gugino, 204 N. Y. 535, 541; Cuppy v. Stollwerck Bros., Inc., 216 id. 591, 594; Jamestown Business College Assn., Ltd., v. Allen, 172 id. 291,294,295; Newburger v. American Surety Co., 242 id. 134,142; Gressing v. Musical Instrument Sales Co., 222 id. 215; Brightson v. Claflin Co., 180 id. 76, 80; Mason v. New York Produce Exchange, 127 App. Div. 282, 285; affd., 196 N. Y. 548; McClelland v. Climax Hosiery Mills, 252 id. 347, 351, 354, 358; Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co., Inc., 263 id. 95, 103, 105.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for breach of contract. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The evidence supports the verdict of the jury. We have examined the rulings complained of and find in them no error of substance. The judgment should be affirmed. (See Watson v. Gugino, 204 N. Y. 535, 541; Cuppy v. Stollwerck Bros., Inc., 216 id. 591, 594; Jamestown Business College Assn., Ltd., v. Allen, 172 id. 291,294,295; Newburger v. American Surety Co., 242 id. 134,142; Gressing v. Musical Instrument Sales Co., 222 id. 215; Brightson v. Claflin Co., 180 id. 76, 80; Mason v. New York Produce Exchange, 127 App. Div. 282, 285; affd., 196 N. Y. 548; McClelland v. Climax Hosiery Mills, 252 id. 347, 351, 354, 358; Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co., Inc., 263 id. 95, 103, 105.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for breach of contract. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 849, 15 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reno-v-pfeil-cooperage-inc-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack