Reno v. Kim Ho Ma
148 L. Ed. 2d 239, 121 S. Ct. 297, 531 U.S. 924, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 6601, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11050, 69 U.S.L.W. 3257, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8303
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 10, 2000
DocketNo. 00-38
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 148 L. Ed. 2d 239 (Reno v. Kim Ho Ma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reno v. Kim Ho Ma, 148 L. Ed. 2d 239, 121 S. Ct. 297, 531 U.S. 924, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 6601, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11050, 69 U.S.L.W. 3257, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8303 (U.S. 2000).
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, case consolidated with No. 99-7791, Zadvydas v. Davis et al., immediately supra, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Resendiz
19 P.3d 1171 (California Supreme Court, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 L. Ed. 2d 239, 121 S. Ct. 297, 531 U.S. 924, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 6601, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11050, 69 U.S.L.W. 3257, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reno-v-kim-ho-ma-scotus-2000.