Reno v. Kim Ho Ma
148 L. Ed. 2d 239, 121 S. Ct. 297, 531 U.S. 924, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 6601, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11050, 69 U.S.L.W. 3257, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8303
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 2000·No. No. 00-38·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, case consolidated with No. 99-7791, Zadvydas v. Davis et al., immediately supra, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reno v. Kim Ho Ma, 148 L. Ed. 2d 239, 121 S. Ct. 297, 531 U.S. 924, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 6601, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11050, 69 U.S.L.W. 3257, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8303 (U.S. 2000).
148 L. Ed. 2d 239 (Reno v. Kim Ho Ma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Resendiz
19 P.3d 1171 (California Supreme Court, 2001)