Reno v. Davis
This text of 6 Ky. Op. 537 (Reno v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The original judgment is erroneous for two reasons.
1st. The petition presents no cause of action against Reno, the surety in the administrator’s bond. Neither the terms nor substance of the bond are set out. Filing a cojpy of the bond with the petition does not dispense with the necessity of setting out the undertaking sued on in the pleading itself.
2d. No judgment should have been rendered until a refunding bond was executed. Montjoy’s Adm’r v. Pearce, 4 Metcalfe 98. Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
The appeal from the judgment refusing a new trial is dismissed.
-, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. Op. 537, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reno-v-davis-kyctapp-1873.