Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board

527 U.S. 1033
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 520 U.S. 471
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 24, 1999·No. No. 98-405; No. 98-406·Published

Opinion

D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 525 U. S. 1118.] Cases restored to calendar for reargument. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs not to exceed 25 pages addressing the following questions: (1) Does the purpose prong of § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 extend to a discriminatory but nonretro-gressive purpose? (2) Assuming, arguendo, that § 5 prohibits the implementation of a districting plan enacted with a discriminatory, nonretrogressive purpose, does the government or the covered jurisdiction bear the burden of proof in this issue?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board, 527 U.S. 1033 (1999).

527 U.S. 1033 (Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.