Renninger v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

47 N.Y.S. 1146

This text of 47 N.Y.S. 1146 (Renninger v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renninger v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 47 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

No opinion. Motion granted, and order amended as follows: Ordered, that that part of the order which denies a motion for a new trial made on a case and exceptions, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, and that it is for excessive damages, affirmed, and that part of the ordei; which denied a motion for a new trial on exceptions taken, and because the verdict is contrary to law, is, together with the judgment, reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. All concur, except WARD, J., dissenting. See 43 N. Y. Supp. 1163.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renninger-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1897.