Rennick v. Walton
This text of 7 Mo. 292 (Rennick v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court, delivered by
This was an action by petition in debt by William P. Walton against Andrew E. Rennick. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty six cents. Plaintiff remitted sixty-five dollars. After yprdict, the defendant moved for a new trial, because the court had admitted improper and illegal testi-and because the verdict was against the weight of testimony. It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that defendant objected to the testimony when it was °®'ere^> aQd a verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not be disturbed by this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Mo. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rennick-v-walton-mo-1842.