Rennick v. Walton
Opinion
Opinion of the Court, delivered by
This was an action by petition in debt by William P. Walton against Andrew E. Rennick. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty six cents. Plaintiff remitted sixty-five dollars. After yprdict, the defendant moved for a new trial, because the court had admitted improper and illegal testi-and because the verdict was against the weight of testimony. It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that defendant objected to the testimony when it was °®'ere^> aQd a verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not be disturbed by this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
7 Mo. 292 (Rennick v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.