Rennick v. Walton

7 Mo. 292
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court, delivered by

Napton, Judge.

This was an action by petition in debt by William P. Walton against Andrew E. Rennick. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty six cents. Plaintiff remitted sixty-five dollars. After yprdict, the defendant moved for a new trial, because the court had admitted improper and illegal testi-and because the verdict was against the weight of testimony. It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that defendant objected to the testimony when it was °®'ere^> aQd a verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not be disturbed by this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rennick v. Walton, 7 Mo. 292 (Mo. 1842).

7 Mo. 292 (Rennick v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax in Estate of Lankford
197 S.W. 147 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1917)
Swing v. Clarksville Cider & Vinegar Co.
77 Mo. App. 391 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Finley v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
73 Mo. App. 643 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)