Rennick v. Walthal
9 Ky. 23, 2 A.K. Marsh. 23, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 131
This text of 9 Ky. 23 (Rennick v. Walthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rennick v. Walthal, 9 Ky. 23, 2 A.K. Marsh. 23, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 131 (Ky. Ct. App. 1819).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The circumstance of Rennick having discovered, after the trial, that one of the jurors was not a house-keeper, we are of opinion, was correctly held by the court below, not to furnish a sufficient cause for a new trial.
The judgment must be affirmed with cost and damages.
Absent, Judge Rowan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Lindquist
W.D. Washington, 2022
Valdez v. Marquez
S.D. California, 2022
Jesse C. Morreale
U.S. Tax Court, 2021
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch
S.D. California, 2020
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Ky. 23, 2 A.K. Marsh. 23, 1819 Ky. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rennick-v-walthal-kyctapp-1819.