Renner v. Meyer

6 N.Y.S. 535, 22 Abb. N. Cas. 438
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided April 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McAdam, C. J.

Judgment creditors seem to have the notion that because they take down the examination of a debtor the examination, when reduced to writing, is their property, which they may take to their office and appropriate as they please. This is a mistake. The examination becomes a court record, and the debtor has sufficient interest in it to require the creditor to file it for future use or reference. Code Civil Proc. § 825. If in this court, the examination should be filed with the clerk thereof, (rule 2,) and the orders appointing a receiver must be filed with the county clerk, (Code Civil Proc. § 2467.) Where the examination has been filed, it may save the debtor considerable time and trouble in case of a subsequent examination by another creditor. There is no reason why the same ordeal should be unnecessarily repeated. Motion to require creditor to file examination granted. Ho costs. Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Renner v. Meyer, 6 N.Y.S. 535, 22 Abb. N. Cas. 438 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

6 N.Y.S. 535 (Renner v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Axinn & Sons Lumber Co. v. Osinski
243 A.D. 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Sinnott v. First National Bank
34 A.D. 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)