Renner v. Bank of Columbia
20 F. Cas. 532, 2 D.C. 310, 2 Cranch 310
This text of 20 F. Cas. 532 (Renner v. Bank of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Renner v. Bank of Columbia, 20 F. Cas. 532, 2 D.C. 310, 2 Cranch 310 (circtddc 1822).
Opinion
(nem. con.) was of opinion that Mr. Jones’s construction of the statute was right.
This opinion was overruled by the Supreme Court of the United States in the ease of Catlett v. Brodie, 9 Wheat. 553.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Catlett v. Brodie
22 U.S. 553 (Supreme Court, 1824)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 532, 2 D.C. 310, 2 Cranch 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renner-v-bank-of-columbia-circtddc-1822.