Renke v. Kwiecinski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Renke v. Kwiecinski

83 A.D.3d 922, 920 N.Y.S.2d 730

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.3d 922 (Renke v. Kwiecinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renke v. Kwiecinski, 83 A.D.3d 922, 920 N.Y.S.2d 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

an action to enforce a foreign judgment, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marber, J.), entered April 5, 2010, as denied her motion to stay enforcement of the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is undisputed that the State of Florida had jurisdiction over the defendant when the judgment at issue was rendered against her. Therefore, the judgment was entitled to full faith and credit from New York State (see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 577 [1991], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]). Since the defendant did not set forth any basis for staying enforcement of the judgment, her motion was properly denied. Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

an action to enforce a foreign judgment, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marber, J.), entered April 5, 2010, as denied her motion to stay enforcement of the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is undisputed that the State of Florida had jurisdiction over the defendant when the judgment at issue was rendered against her. Therefore, the judgment was entitled to full faith and credit from New York State (see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 577 [1991], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]). Since the defendant did not set forth any basis for staying enforcement of the judgment, her motion was properly denied. Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 922, 920 N.Y.S.2d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renke-v-kwiecinski-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack