Renick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Renick v. State

1924 OK CR 264, 229 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 179, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 259

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 8, 1924

DocketNo. A-4562.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 264 (Renick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renick v. State, 1924 OK CR 264, 229 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 179, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 259 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered in the county court of Carter county on the 6th day of October, 1922, wherein the plaintiff in error, Orby Renick, was adjudged guilty of the offense of unlawful possession of intoxicating- liquor, and sentenced as above stated. The petition in error and case-made were not filed in the Criminal Court of Appeals until Febru *180 ary 3, 1923, 120 days after the date of the rendition of the judgment herein. An examination of the record discloses that the trial court made no extension of time for lodging the appeal in this court beyond the 60 days allowed by statute after the rendition of the judgment for taking an appeal in misdemeanor cases under section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921. This being an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered in a misdemeanor case, and the petition in error and case-made not having been filed in this court within the time provided by section 2808, supra, this court never acquired jurisdiction of the appeal, and the same is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered in the county court of Carter county on the 6th day of October, 1922, wherein the plaintiff in error, Orby Renick, was adjudged guilty of the offense of unlawful possession of intoxicating- liquor, and sentenced as above stated. The petition in error and case-made were not filed in the Criminal Court of Appeals until Febru *180 ary 3, 1923, 120 days after the date of the rendition of the judgment herein. An examination of the record discloses that the trial court made no extension of time for lodging the appeal in this court beyond the 60 days allowed by statute after the rendition of the judgment for taking an appeal in misdemeanor cases under section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921. This being an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered in a misdemeanor case, and the petition in error and case-made not having been filed in this court within the time provided by section 2808, supra, this court never acquired jurisdiction of the appeal, and the same is dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 264, 229 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 179, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renick-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.