Renfrow v. Renfrow
This text of 310 S.W.3d 727 (Renfrow v. Renfrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Eugene K. Renfrow, Jr., Linda Sue Kaufman, and Michael W. Renfrow appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Howard County following a jury verdict finding in favor of James L. Renfrow that the last will and testament of Eugene K. Renfrow, Sr., as well other lifetime transfers, were all valid and enforceable. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in: (1) not granting Appellants’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict because the Respondent did not overcome the presumption of undue influence; (2) allowing Respondent to open and close the case; (3) not allowing the testimony of Appellants’ expert witness Bonnie Riley; (4) not removing juror no. 1 for cause; and (4) not dismissing the entire jury and em-panelling a new jury because juror no. 17 made an improper and inflammatory remark. We affirm. 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 S.W.3d 727, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 512, 2010 WL 1610505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renfrow-v-renfrow-moctapp-2010.