Renfrow v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Renfrow v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.

3 N.E.3d 204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1401

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 31, 2014

Docket2013-0761

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.E.3d 204 (Renfrow v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renfrow v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 3 N.E.3d 204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 98715, 2013-Ohio-1189. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Ira L. Podheiser, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied for failure to comply with Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(e). Within ten days of the date of this entry, counsel may file a renewed motion for pro hac vice admission that complies with all the requirements of Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 98715, 2013-Ohio-1189. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Ira L. Podheiser, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied for failure to comply with Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(e). Within ten days of the date of this entry, counsel may file a renewed motion for pro hac vice admission that complies with all the requirements of Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.E.3d 204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renfrow-v-norfolk-s-ry-co-ohio-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack