Renfro v. Kelly
10 Ala. 338
This text of 10 Ala. 338 (Renfro v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Renfro v. Kelly, 10 Ala. 338 (Ala. 1846).
Opinion
We think the proper construction [339]*339of the statutes relating to the compensation of witnesses is, that the witness is entitled to one compensation only-, although summoned by both parties.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edwards v. Bond
8 F. Cas. 343 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois, 1851)
Barron v. Tart
18 Ala. 668 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)
Weissinger v. State
11 Ala. 540 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Ala. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renfro-v-kelly-ala-1846.