Renfro v. Kelly
10 Ala. 338
Opinion
We think the proper construction [339]*339of the statutes relating to the compensation of witnesses is, that the witness is entitled to one compensation only-, although summoned by both parties.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Renfro v. Kelly, 10 Ala. 338 (Ala. 1846).
10 Ala. 338 (Renfro v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. Bond
8 F. Cas. 343 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois, 1851)
Barron v. Tart
18 Ala. 668 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)
Weissinger v. State
11 Ala. 540 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)