Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council
This text of Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council (Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
RENEWABLE REDEVELOPMENT, LLC, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) C.A. No. S24A-12-002 MHC v. ) ) SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL, ) ) Respondent. )
ORDER STAYING THE PROCEEDINGS
Submitted: September 11, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025
This 1st day of December, 2025, upon consideration of the letter briefs of the parties, it appears to the Court that:
1. On December 17, 2024, Sussex County Council (hereinafter “Council”)
voted 4 – 1 to deny Renewable Redevelopment, LLC’s (hereinafter
“Renewable”) application to build an electrical substation in Sussex
County near Millsboro. Renewable then filed this Writ of Certiorari.
2. Soon after the parties briefed the merits of the Writ of Certiorari, the
Delaware General Assembly passed Senate Bill 159, as amended by
Senate Bill 199. These bills took direct aim at the Council’s denial to build the substation essentially overturning the denial effective January
3, 2026.
3. The Court requested letter briefs on the authority of the General
Assembly to enact legislation that overturns the result of Council’s
denial. Based on the research it appears that the General Assembly
possesses such power.
4. Council urges the Court to issue an opinion on the Writ of Certiorari
citing several possible change of circumstances that could affect
whether the wind farm project moves forward as planned. However,
the Court can only proceed on the landscape presently before the Court.
5. If the Court were to opine on the pending Writ of Certiorari, the opinion
would be merely advisory in that the Superior Court would not have
last authoritative say in the matter effective January 31, 2026. Opinion
of the Justices, 413 A.2d 1245 (Del. 1980). It is clear that this Court
has the ability to grant a stay of matters on its docket where other
actions would affect the litigation in this Court. Sperry Rand Corp. v.
United Engines, Inc., 261 A.2d 527 (Del. Super. Ct. 1969), rev’d, 269
A.2d 221 (Del. 1970). 6. In light of the forgoing, the litigation regarding the Writ of Certiorari is
stayed until determination is made whether the Writ of Certiorari is
moot as of February, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Mark H. Conner Mark H. Conner, Judge
oc: Prothonotary xc: Richard A. Forsten, Esquire David Rutt, Esquire
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renewable-redevelopment-llc-v-sussex-county-council-delsuperct-2025.