Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedDecember 1, 2025
DocketS24A-12-002 MHC
StatusPublished

This text of Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council (Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council, (Del. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RENEWABLE REDEVELOPMENT, LLC, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) C.A. No. S24A-12-002 MHC v. ) ) SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER STAYING THE PROCEEDINGS

Submitted: September 11, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025

This 1st day of December, 2025, upon consideration of the letter briefs of the parties, it appears to the Court that:

1. On December 17, 2024, Sussex County Council (hereinafter “Council”)

voted 4 – 1 to deny Renewable Redevelopment, LLC’s (hereinafter

“Renewable”) application to build an electrical substation in Sussex

County near Millsboro. Renewable then filed this Writ of Certiorari.

2. Soon after the parties briefed the merits of the Writ of Certiorari, the

Delaware General Assembly passed Senate Bill 159, as amended by

Senate Bill 199. These bills took direct aim at the Council’s denial to build the substation essentially overturning the denial effective January

3, 2026.

3. The Court requested letter briefs on the authority of the General

Assembly to enact legislation that overturns the result of Council’s

denial. Based on the research it appears that the General Assembly

possesses such power.

4. Council urges the Court to issue an opinion on the Writ of Certiorari

citing several possible change of circumstances that could affect

whether the wind farm project moves forward as planned. However,

the Court can only proceed on the landscape presently before the Court.

5. If the Court were to opine on the pending Writ of Certiorari, the opinion

would be merely advisory in that the Superior Court would not have

last authoritative say in the matter effective January 31, 2026. Opinion

of the Justices, 413 A.2d 1245 (Del. 1980). It is clear that this Court

has the ability to grant a stay of matters on its docket where other

actions would affect the litigation in this Court. Sperry Rand Corp. v.

United Engines, Inc., 261 A.2d 527 (Del. Super. Ct. 1969), rev’d, 269

A.2d 221 (Del. 1970). 6. In light of the forgoing, the litigation regarding the Writ of Certiorari is

stayed until determination is made whether the Writ of Certiorari is

moot as of February, 2026.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Mark H. Conner Mark H. Conner, Judge

oc: Prothonotary xc: Richard A. Forsten, Esquire David Rutt, Esquire

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sperry Rand Corporation v. United Engines, Inc.
261 A.2d 527 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1969)
United Engines, Inc. v. Sperry Rand Corporation
269 A.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1970)
Opinion of the Justices
413 A.2d 1245 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Renewable Redevelopment, LLC v. Sussex County Council, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renewable-redevelopment-llc-v-sussex-county-council-delsuperct-2025.