Renew v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Renew v. State

120 S.E. 17, 31 Ga. App. 184, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 831

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 15, 1923

Docket14990

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 17 (Renew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renew v. State, 120 S.E. 17, 31 Ga. App. 184, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 831 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence was amply sufficient to authorize the conviction. Indeed, the sheriff testified that the defendant confessed his guilt; and the confession was not denied or attacked. The court, after having approved the verdict, property overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence was amply sufficient to authorize the conviction. Indeed, the sheriff testified that the defendant confessed his guilt; and the confession was not denied or attacked. The court, after having approved the verdict, property overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 17, 31 Ga. App. 184, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renew-v-state-gactapp-1923.