Renelique v. Tri State Consumers Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Renelique v. Tri State Consumers Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 3, 2016

Docket2016 NYSlipOp 50867(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Renelique v. Tri State Consumers Ins. Co. (Renelique v. Tri State Consumers Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renelique v. Tri State Consumers Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Pierre Jean Jacques Renelique, as Assignee of MANENDRA BHAGWANDIN, Appellant,

against

Tri State Consumers Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered June 28, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that it had fully paid plaintiff in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule. The Civil Court granted defendant's motion.

For the reasons stated in Renelique, as Assignee of Yvon Delgado v Tri State Consumers Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2013-1709 Q C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.

Decision Date: June 03, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI