Renegar v. Barry
This text of 254 A.D. 643 (Renegar v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Lewis and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and the facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the record discloses no actionable negligence toward [644]*644the plaintiff. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for personal injuries sustained on a ball diamond at an amusement park. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 643, 3 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renegar-v-barry-nyappdiv-1938.