Renee Reeves v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion filed July 16, 2026

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-25-00059-CR __________

RENEE REEVES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 70th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. A-20-0971-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Appellant, Renee Reeves, of burglary of a habitation, a second-degree felony, and assessed her punishment at imprisonment for five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(c)(2) (West Supp. 2025). Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw in this court, supported by a brief in which counsel states that he professionally and conscientiously examined the record and applicable law and concludes that there are no arguable issues to present on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel has provided Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, an explanatory letter, and copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. Counsel also advised Appellant of her right to: (1) object to counsel’s motion to withdraw; (2) review the record; (3) file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief; and (4) file a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5, 68. As such, court- appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders, 386 U.S. at 742– 44; Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409–12; and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Appellant has not filed a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record and likewise conclude that the appeal is without merit. 1 See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

W. BRUCE WILLIAMS JUSTICE July 16, 2026 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

We note that Appellant has the right to file a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court 1

of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Rule 68 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. 2