RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA

Court of Appeals of Georgia

RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA

DecidedFebruary 9, 2026

DocketA26E0141

StatusPublished

This text of RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA (RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA, (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 09, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26E0141. RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Appellant has petitioned this Court for a Writ of Mandamus seeking the stay of an allegedly unlawful foreclosure upon property located in Lithonia, Georgia. But having reviewed Appellant’s petition, this does not appear to be one of the rare instances that will invoke this Court’s original mandamus jurisdiction. In general, “the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983). Thus, before seeking to invoke this Court’s original mandamus jurisdiction, the procedure which must be followed is to first file the petition in the appropriate lower court. See Graham v. Cavender, 252 Ga. 123, 123 (311 SE2d 832) (1984); Expedia, Inc. v. City of Columbus, 305 Ga. App. 450, 455(2)(b) (699 SE2d 600) (2010) (“Except in the rarest of cases, litigants seeking to invoke this Court’s original jurisdiction . . . must first petition the superior court for such relief.”). In this matter, it does not appear that Appellant filed a petition for a Writ of Mandamus in the appropriate lower court. Accordingly, Appellant’s petition is hereby DENIED. See Court of Appeals Rule 40(c)(1).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/09/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 09, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26E0141. RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Appellant has petitioned this Court for a Writ of Mandamus seeking the stay of an allegedly unlawful foreclosure upon property located in Lithonia, Georgia. But having reviewed Appellant’s petition, this does not appear to be one of the rare instances that will invoke this Court’s original mandamus jurisdiction. In general, “the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983). Thus, before seeking to invoke this Court’s original mandamus jurisdiction, the procedure which must be followed is to first file the petition in the appropriate lower court. See Graham v. Cavender, 252 Ga. 123, 123 (311 SE2d 832) (1984); Expedia, Inc. v. City of Columbus, 305 Ga. App. 450, 455(2)(b) (699 SE2d 600) (2010) (“Except in the rarest of cases, litigants seeking to invoke this Court’s original jurisdiction . . . must first petition the superior court for such relief.”). In this matter, it does not appear that Appellant filed a petition for a Writ of Mandamus in the appropriate lower court. Accordingly, Appellant’s petition is hereby DENIED. See Court of Appeals Rule 40(c)(1).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/09/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

RENEE FEATHERSTON-SPURLIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renee-featherston-spurlin-v-state-of-georgia-gactapp-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack