Rendrick Anthony Cheeks v. State
This text of Rendrick Anthony Cheeks v. State (Rendrick Anthony Cheeks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted; Order filed February 7, 2013.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-12-00676-CR ____________
RENDRICK ANTHONY CHEEKS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1328385
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant requested an extension of time to file his response to counsel’s Anders brief because he has not received a copy of the record. We GRANT the request and issue the following order. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 232nd District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before February 22, 2013; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rendrick Anthony Cheeks v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rendrick-anthony-cheeks-v-state-texapp-2013.