Rendleman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rendleman v. State

571 S.W.3d 702

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 2019·No. No. ED 106661·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven C. Rendleman appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his motions filed under Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Steven C. Rendleman appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his motions filed under Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Rendleman v. State, 571 S.W.3d 702 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

571 S.W.3d 702 (Rendleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.