Rendleman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rendleman v. State

571 S.W.3d 702

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 16, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106661

StatusPublished

This text of 571 S.W.3d 702 (Rendleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rendleman v. State, 571 S.W.3d 702 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven C. Rendleman appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his motions filed under Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Steven C. Rendleman appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his motions filed under Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 S.W.3d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rendleman-v-state-moctapp-2019.