Rendish v. City of Tacoma

Ninth Circuit

Rendish v. City of Tacoma

134 F.3d 1389, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 668, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1020, 1998 WL 24311

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 26, 1998·No. No. 96-36150·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Order; Dissent by

Judge REINHARDT.

The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is REJECTED.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order; Dissent by

Judge REINHARDT.

The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is REJECTED.¹

Rendish v. City of Tacoma, 134 F.3d 1389, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 668, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1020, 1998 WL 24311 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

134 F.3d 1389 (Rendish v. City of Tacoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 668, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 871 Kimberly Rendish v. City of Tacoma Ray C. Corpuz, City Manager for the City of Tacoma, in His Individual Capacity Robin Jenkinson, City Attorney for the City of Tacoma, in Her Individual Capacity John Kouklis, Chief Assistant City Attorney for the City of Tacoma, in His Individual Capacity John Does 1-10, in Their Individual Capacities Jane Does 1-10, in Their Individual Capacities

134 F.3d 1389 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Opinions

Related