Render v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Render v. State

116 S.E. 654, 30 Ga. App. 14, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 217

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 6, 1923

Docket14092

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 654 (Render v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Render v. State, 116 S.E. 654, 30 Ga. App. 14, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 217 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case fully authorized the defendant’s conviction ot larceny. The one special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the charge of the court, in view of the evidence, was not error. The trial court having approved the verdict, and there being no reversible error of law upon the trial, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case fully authorized the defendant’s conviction ot larceny. The one special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the charge of the court, in view of the evidence, was not error. The trial court having approved the verdict, and there being no reversible error of law upon the trial, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 654, 30 Ga. App. 14, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/render-v-state-gactapp-1923.