Renda v. Westchester Street Transportation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Renda v. Westchester Street Transportation Co.

29 A.D.2d 775, 289 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 775 (Renda v. Westchester Street Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renda v. Westchester Street Transportation Co., 29 A.D.2d 775, 289 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 29, 1967, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to remove the action from the City Court of Mount Vernon to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, and for leave to amend their complaint, reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without prejudice, however, to a renewal of the motion, if plaintiffs be so advised, on proper papers as indicated herein. In order for this action to be removed to the Supreme Court and the complaint amended, a physician’s affidavit should be submitted showing a causal connection between the newly discovered injuries and the accident (cf. Northern Ins. Go. of N. T. v. Kregsma/n, 26 A D 2d 648). Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 29, 1967, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to remove the action from the City Court of Mount Vernon to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, and for leave to amend their complaint, reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without prejudice, however, to a renewal of the motion, if plaintiffs be so advised, on proper papers as indicated herein. In order for this action to be removed to the Supreme Court and the complaint amended, a physician’s affidavit should be submitted showing a causal connection between the newly discovered injuries and the accident (cf. Northern Ins. Go. of N. T. v. Kregsma/n, 26 A D 2d 648). Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 775, 289 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renda-v-westchester-street-transportation-co-nyappdiv-1968.