Rencsok v. Rencsok

168 N.W.2d 439, 16 Mich. App. 643, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1451
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 27, 1969
DocketDocket No. 5,334
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 168 N.W.2d 439 (Rencsok v. Rencsok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rencsok v. Rencsok, 168 N.W.2d 439, 16 Mich. App. 643, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1451 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, in a suit against her husband and 17 others, claimed she had been defrauded of her interest in assets jointly owned by plaintiff [644]*644and defendant husband. A default judgment was entered against defendant husband who appeals.

The default was properly entered and will not be set aside. Defendant failed to show good cause and neglected to file an affidavit of facts showing a meritorious defense as required by GrCR 1963, 520.4. See also White v. Sadler (1957), 350 Mich 511.

Other matters raised have been considered and are deemed without merit.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rencsok v. Rencsok
207 N.W.2d 910 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
Sheneman v. Sheneman
186 N.W.2d 344 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.W.2d 439, 16 Mich. App. 643, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rencsok-v-rencsok-michctapp-1969.