Renaud v. State
This text of 901 So. 2d 1032 (Renaud v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wilmann RENAUD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Golant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), we summarily affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion, and as in Covell v. State, 891 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), certify conflict with Fitzpatrick v. State, 863 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) and Berthiaume v. State, 864 So.2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). See also Campbell v. State, 718 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Gardner v. State, 707 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)).
STONE, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
901 So. 2d 1032, 2005 WL 1226141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renaud-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.