Renardo Ferguson v. State of Florida

192 So. 3d 534, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 2016
Docket4D16-97
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 534 (Renardo Ferguson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renardo Ferguson v. State of Florida, 192 So. 3d 534, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RENARDO FERGUSON, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D16-97

[May 4, 2016]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 07008939CF10A and 07013853CF10A.

Renardo Ferguson, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McLendon v. State, 58 So. 3d 387, 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (breach of a plea agreement does not render sentence illegal, and claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800 (a)).

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLendon v. State
58 So. 3d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 3d 534, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renardo-ferguson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.