Renard v. Wyckoff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Renard v. Wyckoff

84 N.W. 410, 61 Neb. 19, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 67

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 5, 1900

DocketNo. 11,685

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.W. 410 (Renard v. Wyckoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renard v. Wyckoff, 84 N.W. 410, 61 Neb. 19, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 67 (Neb. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Normal, C. J.

A judgment of the district court is before us for review by petition in error. The cause has been submitted under section 1, rule 2, which provides “for such submission on printed briefs accompanied by or containing an agreed printed abstract of the record and evidence upon which the case is to be determined.” The planted abstract herein does not contain the petition in error nor an abstract of the assignments of error. No question, therefore, is presented for review. O’Neill v. Flood, 58 Nebr., 218; Manning v. Freeman, 58 Nebr., 485. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Normal, C. J.

A judgment of the district court is before us for review by petition in error. The cause has been submitted under section 1, rule 2, which provides “for such submission on printed briefs accompanied by or containing an agreed printed abstract of the record and evidence upon which the case is to be determined.” The planted abstract herein does not contain the petition in error nor an abstract of the assignments of error. No question, therefore, is presented for review. O’Neill v. Flood, 58 Nebr., 218; Manning v. Freeman, 58 Nebr., 485. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.W. 410, 61 Neb. 19, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renard-v-wyckoff-neb-1900.