Renaldo Robinson, Praying for Monition Vs.
This text of Renaldo Robinson, Praying for Monition Vs. (Renaldo Robinson, Praying for Monition Vs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RENALDO ROBINSON, * NO. 2022-CA-0851 PRAYING FOR MONITION * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT
* STATE OF LOUISIANA
*
* *******
CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH:
KERRIELLE T. SMITH AND CHRIS NO. 2022-CA-0852 TAYLOR, III
VERSUS
RENALDO ROBINSON
RDJ JOHNSON, J., DISSENTS AND ASSIGNS REASONS
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and would affirm the trial
court.
While I agree with the majority that this Court has mandated that “the trial
judge permit an amendment of the pleadings when there is a conceivable
possibility that a cause of action may yet be stated by a plaintiff.” Cooper v. Pub.
Belt R.R., 00-0378, p. 4 (La. App. 4 Cir. 12/20/00), 776 So.2d 639, 641. La. C.C.P.
art. 934 provides that “[w]hen the grounds of the objection pleaded by peremptory
exception may be removed by amendment of the petition, the judgment sustaining
the exception shall order such amendment within the delay allowed by the court.”
If, however, “the grounds of the objection raised through the exception cannot be
so removed”, then “the action, claim, demand, issue, or theory shall be dismissed.”
As such, I find that the trial court did not err in sustaining the exception.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Renaldo Robinson, Praying for Monition Vs., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renaldo-robinson-praying-for-monition-vs-lactapp-2023.