Renaissance Project, Inc. v. Village of Tarrytown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Renaissance Project, Inc. v. Village of Tarrytown

38 A.D.2d 954, 331 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 954 (Renaissance Project, Inc. v. Village of Tarrytown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renaissance Project, Inc. v. Village of Tarrytown, 38 A.D.2d 954, 331 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 7, 1971, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision and denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of certain provisions of the zoning ordinance of the Village of Tarrytown. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order of said court dated June 15, 1971, dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Respondents Village of Tarrytown and William Baird are granted one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 7, 1971, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision and denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of certain provisions of the zoning ordinance of the Village of Tarrytown. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order of said court dated June 15, 1971, dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Respondents Village of Tarrytown and William Baird are granted one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 954, 331 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renaissance-project-inc-v-village-of-tarrytown-nyappdiv-1972.