Remy v. Municipality No. Two

15 La. Ann. 657
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 La. Ann. 657 (Remy v. Municipality No. Two) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remy v. Municipality No. Two, 15 La. Ann. 657 (La. 1860).

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Plaintiffs having recovered of defendant, by judgment of this court rendered in June, 1857, reported in 11th An. 148, a portion of ground on the batture in front of the city, instituted in March, 1858, the present suit, for interest of the estimated value of said portion of land-from 1820 to 1856, as fruits, on the ground that the city was a possessor in bad faith of this land during all that time. The evidence shows, that during nearly all the time mentioned, the land in question was a part of the public landing or bank of the river not enclosed nor appropriated to any private use. It is recognized by many decisions, that the city has by law the administration of the batture, and (until the Act of 1853) the exclusive right of determining when and to what extent the riparian proprietor might occupy the batture or alluvion, within the limits of the corporation. The position, that the occupation of the batture by the city was a possession in bad faith, is untenable. The very judgment of this court in 11th Annual, under which plaintiffs claim, reserves the right of the city to the administration of the batture.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manson v. Board of Levee Commissioners
153 So. 477 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
New Orleans v. Morris
18 F. Cas. 114 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. Ann. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remy-v-municipality-no-two-la-1860.