Remson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Remson v. State

143 S.E. 436, 38 Ga. App. 127, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 80

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1928

Docket18741

StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E. 436 (Remson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Remson v. State, 143 S.E. 436, 38 Ga. App. 127, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 80 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Blood worth, J.

1. In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error he did not argue the sole special ground of the motion for a new trial, nor was there any general insistence on all the grounds. Hence this court can not consider the special ground.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury. The trial judge approved the verdict, and did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. H. E. Combs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Fells, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blood worth, J.

1. In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error he did not argue the sole special ground of the motion for a new trial, nor was there any general insistence on all the grounds. Hence this court can not consider the special ground.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury. The trial judge approved the verdict, and did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. H. E. Combs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Fells, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E. 436, 38 Ga. App. 127, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remson-v-state-gactapp-1928.