Remshart v. Ham

40 Ga. 344
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 40 Ga. 344 (Remshart v. Ham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remshart v. Ham, 40 Ga. 344 (Ga. 1869).

Opinion

Warner, J.

According to the previous rulings of a majority of this Court, the defendant in the judgment did. not show .on the trial of this case any equitable ground of defense which authorized him to have the judgment opened and scaled, under the provisions of the Relief Act of 1868. The judg[346]*346ment of tbe Court below, allowing the motion to open judgment, was error, and should be reversed. I concur in the judgment of reversal in this case, on- the ground that the second section of the Relief Act of 1868, which provides for the opening and scaling judgments rendered prior to June, 1865, not only violates the Constitution of the United States, but is also in violation of the Constitution of this State, and is therefore void.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ga. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remshart-v-ham-ga-1869.