Remsen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

45 N.Y.S. 536, 17 A.D. 637
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 N.Y.S. 536 (Remsen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remsen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 45 N.Y.S. 536, 17 A.D. 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion for a stay should be granted upon condition that the defendants, within 15 days after the entry of the order herein, file in the office of the clerk of the city and county of blew York an undertaking with sufficient sureties to the effect that, if the judgment herein be affirmed or the appeal be dismissed by the court of appeals, the defendants will pay the costs, and, in addition, the sum of $22,434.02 with interest from the 30th of December, 1895, the sureties to justify, etc., in case they are excepted to; and upon the further condition that the defendants, within said 15 days, execute a bond in the penalty of $48,000, with two sufficient sureties, who shall justify, etc.; the bond to be conditioned for the payment of $24,290.27, with interest from December 30, 1895, in case the judgment herein be affirmed or the appeal dismissed by the court of appeals, upon the tender to them of the deed provided for in the judgment appealed from; and also upon the condition that within said [537]*53715 days the defendants file in the office of the clerk of the city and county of New York a. stipulation that during the pendency of this action they will not institute or prosecute any proceedings to condemn any right, interest, or easement of the plaintiffs described in the complaint herein; the plaintiffs to be at liberty to deposit in escrow with the clerk of the city and county of New York the deed referred to in the judgment, which deed is to be delivered to the defendants upon the payment of the amount of fee damage awarded by the judgment.

The order should be accordingly reversed, and the motion granted, upon compliance by the defendants with the foregoing conditions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tulare Irrigation District v. Superior Court
242 P. 725 (California Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 N.Y.S. 536, 17 A.D. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remsen-v-metropolitan-elevated-railway-co-nyappdiv-1897.