Remsen v. Isaacs
1 Cai. Cas. 22b
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 22b (Remsen v. Isaacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Remsen v. Isaacs, 1 Cai. Cas. 22b (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
The rule is according to the decision cited. The application must be for irregularity only to bring it on [39]*39as a non-enumerated motion. If merits are united, it becomes enumerated.
Motion denied.
S. P. Foden and Slater v. Sharp, & Johns. Rep. 183. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 22b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remsen-v-isaacs-nysupct-1803.