Remsen v. Isaacs

1 Cai. Cas. 22b
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 22b (Remsen v. Isaacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remsen v. Isaacs, 1 Cai. Cas. 22b (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The rule is according to the decision cited. The application must be for irregularity only to bring it on [39]*39as a non-enumerated motion. If merits are united, it becomes enumerated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 22b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remsen-v-isaacs-nysupct-1803.