Remppis v. Ettelt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Remppis v. Ettelt

165 A. 744, 310 Pa. 479, 1933 Pa. LEXIS 458

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 24, 1933·No. Appeal, 136·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this appeal from judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover damages for injuries resulting from the collision of plaintiff’s and defendant’s automobiles, the only questions raised relate to the facts involved in connection with the accident. They were properly submitted to the jury in a charge to which no exception was taken. The verdict is amply sustained by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this appeal from judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover damages for injuries resulting from the collision of plaintiff’s and defendant’s automobiles, the only questions raised relate to the facts involved in connection with the accident. They were properly submitted to the jury in a charge to which no exception was taken. The verdict is amply sustained by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Remppis v. Ettelt, 165 A. 744, 310 Pa. 479, 1933 Pa. LEXIS 458 (Pa. 1933).

Pincite

165 A. 744 (Remppis v. Ettelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related