Remlinger v. Grange Store

Washington Supreme Court

Remlinger v. Grange Store

177 P.2d 83, 27 Wash. 2d 960, 1947 Wash. LEXIS 345

Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 11, 1947·No. No. 30116.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause is before us on respondents’ motion, made in this court, to strike appellant’s statement of facts, on the ground that the statement was not filed with the clerk of the superior court within the ninety-day period prescribed by Rule 9(1), Rules of the Supreme Court, 18 Wn. (2d) 9-a.

The facts and circumstances upon which the motion rests are fully stated in State ex rel. The Grange Store v. Riddell, ante p. 134, and need not be repeated here. Upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, respondents’ motion will be granted, and the statement of facts will be stricken. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause is before us on respondents’ motion, made in this court, to strike appellant’s statement of facts, on the ground that the statement was not filed with the clerk of the superior court within the ninety-day period prescribed by Rule 9(1), Rules of the Supreme Court, 18 Wn. (2d) 9-a.

The facts and circumstances upon which the motion rests are fully stated in State ex rel. The Grange Store v. Riddell, ante p. 134, and need not be repeated here. Upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, respondents’ motion will be granted, and the statement of facts will be stricken. ■

Remlinger v. Grange Store, 177 P.2d 83, 27 Wash. 2d 960, 1947 Wash. LEXIS 345 (Wash. 1947).

Pincite

177 P.2d 83 (Remlinger v. Grange Store) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.