Remington v. Shults Bread Co.
159 A.D. 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1913·Published
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury, under the circumstances of the proof. (Hickman v. Schimper & Co., 125 App. Div. 216.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Remington v. Shults Bread Co., 159 A.D. 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
159 A.D. 924 (Remington v. Shults Bread Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hickman v. William Schimper & Co.
125 A.D. 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)