Remington Arms Co. v. Caldwell

820 S.W.2d 762, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 753, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 162, 1991 WL 118557
Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 19, 1991·No. No. C-9966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of sanctions imposed by respondents for abuse of discovery. Relator has moved for rehearing of our denial of leave to file its petition. We believe that the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of our opinion today in TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991). Accordingly, we deny this motion for rehearing without addressing the issues raised in the petition for mandamus and without prejudice to relators again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Remington Arms Co. v. Caldwell, 820 S.W.2d 762, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 753, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 162, 1991 WL 118557 (Tex. 1991).

820 S.W.2d 762 (Remington Arms Co. v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. Caldwell
850 S.W.2d 167 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)