Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Remetich v. Remetich

Remetich v. Remetich

110 A.D.2d 760, 488 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48661
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.D.2d 760 (Remetich v. Remetich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remetich v. Remetich, 110 A.D.2d 760, 488 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

[761]*761Plaintiff failed to timely exercise her option to purchase defendant’s interest in the marital residence in the clear and explicit manner stated in the separation agreement; to wit, by certified mail on or before a stated date. There are no issues of fact calling for a hearing on the motion. Further, the facts alleged by plaintiff at Special Term as to conversations prior to the option date do not constitute an estoppel against defendant. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eric C. Rajala, Trustee in Bankruptcy for General Poly Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Allied Corporation, and Cross-Appellee
919 F.2d 610 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.2d 760, 488 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remetich-v-remetich-nyappdiv-1985.