Remeta v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Remeta v. State

761 S.W.2d 606, 297 Ark. 391, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 543

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 19, 1988

DocketCR 87-214

StatusPublished

This text of 761 S.W.2d 606 (Remeta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Remeta v. State, 761 S.W.2d 606, 297 Ark. 391, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 543 (Ark. 1988).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Daniel Eugene Remeta, moves to be appointed co-counsel in his appeal and to be allowed to argue orally in person. Those motions are denied. We deny as well his motion to supplement the brief to be filed by his attorney. However, we note that if, after his attorney’s brief is filed, Remeta files a motion demonstrating that his attorney’s brief is inadequate he may be permitted to file a supplemental brief, pro se. See Wade v. State, 288 Ark. 94, 702 S.W.2d 28 (1986).

We also deny, without prejudice, Remeta’s request to be allowed additional pages in the argument portion of his brief. See Pemberton v. State, 291 Ark. 198, 723 S.W.2d 372 (1987).

The brief to be filed by Remeta’s attorney is due in sixty days.

Purtle, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI