Remer v. Peck
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89
This text of 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89 (Remer v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Remer v. Peck, 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89 (N.Y. 1843).
Opinion
Decided that a surrogate has jurisdiction to decree an account against executors, upon the application of [90]*90ñ person claiming to bo á creditor of the decedent, although the existence of the debt is denied by the executors.
Decree appealed from affirmed with costs, and proceedings remitted to the surrogate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remer-v-peck-nychanct-1843.