Remer v. Peck
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89
Opinion
Decided that a surrogate has jurisdiction to decree an account against executors, upon the application of [90] ñ person claiming to bo á creditor of the decedent, although the existence of the debt is denied by the executors.
Decree appealed from affirmed with costs, and proceedings remitted to the surrogate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Remer v. Peck, 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89 (N.Y. 1843).
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 89 (Remer v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.