Remer v. Benedict

88 A. 383, 81 N.J. Eq. 222, 11 Buchanan 222, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 347
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 5, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice,- Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oh, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treacy — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Remer v. Benedict, 88 A. 383, 81 N.J. Eq. 222, 11 Buchanan 222, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 347 (N.J. 1913).

88 A. 383 (Remer v. Benedict) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.