Remedial Construction Services, Inc. v. Aizar Karam, A. Karam & Company, Ind. D/B/A the Whistle Stop and/or Palm Valley Distributing Co., Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 2005
Docket13-05-00489-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Remedial Construction Services, Inc. v. Aizar Karam, A. Karam & Company, Ind. D/B/A the Whistle Stop and/or Palm Valley Distributing Co., Inc. (Remedial Construction Services, Inc. v. Aizar Karam, A. Karam & Company, Ind. D/B/A the Whistle Stop and/or Palm Valley Distributing Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remedial Construction Services, Inc. v. Aizar Karam, A. Karam & Company, Ind. D/B/A the Whistle Stop and/or Palm Valley Distributing Co., Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-489-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.,               Appellant,

                                           v.

AIZAR KARAM, ET AL.,                                            Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

                 On appeal from the 275th  District Court

                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-5017-97-E(1).  After the clerk=s record was received, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellant no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 20th day of October, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Remedial Construction Services, Inc. v. Aizar Karam, A. Karam & Company, Ind. D/B/A the Whistle Stop and/or Palm Valley Distributing Co., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remedial-construction-services-inc-v-aizar-karam-a-texapp-2005.