Remco Industries, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Remco Industries, Inc. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 906, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1641

United States Customs Court·Decided November 16, 1967·No. No. P67/402·Published

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Remco Industries, Inc. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 906, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1641 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

59 Cust. Ct. 906 (Remco Industries, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related