Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc.

Second Circuit

Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc.

397 F.2d 977

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 27, 1968·No. No. 551, Docket 32386·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Remeo Industries, Inc., initiated the present action against appellees Toyomenka, Inc. and Bert Gorman & Associates for unfair competition and violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). The complaint which sought a permanent injunction and damages, alleged that appellees were unfairly competing in the sale of a certain toy jeep. A motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the appellees, during the pendency of the action, from engaging in continued acts of unfair competition and trademark infringement was denied by Hon. Frederick vanPelt Bryan, 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D. N.Y. April 26, 1968). We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Bryan’s thorough opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Remeo Industries, Inc., initiated the present action against appellees Toyomenka, Inc. and Bert Gorman & Associates for unfair competition and violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). The complaint which sought a permanent injunction and damages, alleged that appellees were unfairly competing in the sale of a certain toy jeep. A motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the appellees, during the pendency of the action, from engaging in continued acts of unfair competition and trademark infringement was denied by Hon. Frederick vanPelt Bryan, 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D. N.Y. April 26, 1968). We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Bryan’s thorough opinion.

Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc., 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

397 F.2d 977 (Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related