Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc.

397 F.2d 977
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 1968
DocketNo. 551, Docket 32386
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 397 F.2d 977 (Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc., 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Remeo Industries, Inc., initiated the present action against appellees Toyomenka, Inc. and Bert Gorman & Associates for unfair competition and violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). The complaint which sought a permanent injunction and damages, alleged that appellees were unfairly competing in the sale of a certain toy jeep. A motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the appellees, during the pendency of the action, from engaging in continued acts of unfair competition and trademark infringement was denied by Hon. Frederick vanPelt Bryan, 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D. N.Y. April 26, 1968). We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Bryan’s thorough opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warner Bros. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
523 F. Supp. 611 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co.
484 F. Supp. 643 (S.D. New York, 1979)
McGregor-Doniger, Inc. v. Drizzle, Inc.
446 F. Supp. 160 (S.D. New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 F.2d 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/remco-industries-inc-v-toyomenka-inc-ca2-1968.