Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 725 F.3d 1377
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 10, 2012·No. 2012-1510·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-1510 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

REMBRANDT VISION TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1510

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in case no. 11-CV-0819, Judge Timothy J. Corrigan.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The parties jointly move for an extension of time for Johnson & Johnson to file its opposition brief, and for an extension of time for Rembrandt to file its reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 12-1510 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2012

REMBRANDT VISION TECH V. JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION 2

The motion is granted. Johnson & Johnson’s opposition brief is due December 26, 2012 and Rembrandt’s reply brief is due March 8, 2013.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.